Stuff:Agora Ciudadana
From Wiki
(Redirected from Stuff:Agora Voting)
- URL (https://github.com/agoraciudadana/agora-ciudadana) 1
- Currency of guidance (consensus) 3
- Date (September 16, 2012) 4
- Is candidate mutable (false) 6
- Is inclusive (true) 7
- Purpose (Stuff:Decision) 9
- Issue type (Category:Norm) 10
- Issue type (Category:Office (not)) 11
- Stage (alpha) 12
- Temporal continuity (punctual) 6
- Width (877) 10
Notes
- ^ See also http://agoravoting.com/.
- ^ a b Readme file. https://github.com/agoraciudadana/agora-ciudadana/blob/062a5cb834ee601aac64c3c9bae3d3199d978839/README.md
- ^ "Agora Ciudadana is a social web site where anyone can create or join in an agora. An agora has a set of members which can vote in the agora's elections either by direct vote or by delegating the vote."2
- ^ Undocumented. Dating from announcement of version 1.0. See also historical information on origin of code in this post.
- ^ a b Open proposal elaboration. https://blog.agoravoting.com/index.php/2013/07/07/open-proposal-elaboration/
- ^ a b "The third stage is proposal selection, which corresponds to our traditional idea of voting. Having a given pool of proposals that have evolved during the other two stages of aggregation, the voting population is asked to vote for one (or many)."5 This implies a punctual vote and immutable candidate.
- ^ "Agora Ciudadana is a social web site where anyone can create or join in an agora. An agora has a set of members which can vote in the agora's elections either by direct vote or by delegating the vote."2 The intent is to include everyone affected by the decisions.
- ^ a b Reference deployment: Agora Voting. https://agoravoting.com/
- ^ The front page of the website says, "A new way of / Making group decisions"8. A design proposal implies the same purpose: "In summary, a three stage model of information aggregation as decision making is proposed."5.
- ^ a b c For each issue ("election"), the voter is offered one or more questions and asked to "Select up to 1 answers" from a list of choices. Apparently the choice width is potentially large, but not unbounded in practice. Clearly the issue can be normative as in the example here. https://agoravoting.com/Jabi1881/murcia-polemicas/election/sobre-el-aeropuerto-de-corvera
- ^ The issues are called 'elections' and the question format implies that it can handle at least a single-winner election. But it's undocumented. And I didn't find an electoral example in the reference deployment; just the normative ones.10
- ^ It's running.8
