--- Log opened Sat Dec 24 00:00:38 2011
00:22 < sdboyer> Amgine: that's one of the ideas i've batted around, but the key has to do with being de facto *required* to operate in a "individual admin users have the power to do things in the group" paradigm, replacing it with group decisions & processes to take such actions
00:22 < sdboyer> being able to make a choice as a group to delegate such actions to a janitor would be fine by me
00:23 < sdboyer> and often, i'm sure, more efficacious
00:24 < Amgine> "group janitor is made responsible for x, y, and zed by the group. While we aren't going to oversee every action to comply with x, y, and zed, we will oversee their work."
00:25 < Amgine> "They can be dismissed by the will of the group, with or without cause."
00:26 < Amgine> It's exactly the same situation, just that it is viewed through a different lense.
00:26 < Amgine> lens.
00:26 < Amgine> silent e is out to get me.
09:33 < LP_> Amgine: re: "group janitor": we're actually starting the conversation with how to make more realistic parallels between IRL group dynamics and site dynamics, i.e. re-evaluating traditional permissions and ACLs, not just names.
12:31 < scottrigby> ey everyone
12:31 < scottrigby> appy olidays!
14:16 < Amgine> <pongs LP_>
14:17 < Amgine> a
--- Log closed Sun Dec 25 00:00:53 2011