Work plan for the aetiology

    claim+ the surprise
        / viz. what calls for an aetiology/explanation
        ?+ My rhetoric plan for an aetiologic essay (domain of philosophy or science)
          calls for using surprise at the presence of a phenomenon as the warrant
          for seeking an explanation of it.  What need I know about the relation
          between surprise and explanation?  Who has given thought to it?
    gather+ potential explanations
    vet+ the gathered explanations
        : note : Reaching the conclusion in 2 (maybe 3) stages: (unsure, raw from notepad 2026-5-11)
           0. (maybe) Surprise is not mitigated by consideration of observer selection effects,
              as it is for the cosmos’s support of basic life in geogenic time.
           1. The base fine-tuning is for intelligent life {viz. noons|cogitants}
              in cosmic {cosmogenic} time, that for basic life’s origin in geogenic time
              is derivative of the base.
           2. The explanation is not multiverse, but might be designer.
    task+ what remains