!! what is qualified cannot ground the absolute principle of a moral law : re `(absolute principle) of a (moral law)` see `^*: re .${2}.+${1}`s @ ~/work/ethics/text.brec ! the creators in being contingent are qualified in a sense that might be taken as making them unfit to ground that absolute principle : re `the creators.+being contingent` see `^*• mundane design by cosmic creators$` @ ~/work/ethics/text.brec - not so ∵ already the principle is grounded as absolute : re `(the principle) is (grounded) as (absolute)` see `^*- ${1} is ${3} ∵ it is ${2} in a truth of.+logic` / meantime the theoretic role of the creators in regard to the principle is to satisfy two other conditions of moral law that merely *refer* to that principle, namely those of commanding and enforcing it : re `creators.+satisfy.+commanding`s see `^*b. its command.+by our creator$` @ `^^moral law, conditions that hold$`i @ ~/work/ethics/normative/._/text.notes.brec : re `creators.+satisfy.+enforcing`s see `^*c. the creator’s backing of it by force$` @ `^^moral law, conditions that hold$`i @ ~/work/ethics/applied/._/text.notes.brec ! the default practical ground in being default is qualified in a sense that makes it unfit to ground that absolute principle - not so ∵ already the principle is grounded as absolute : see / meantime the theoretic role of the default practical ground in regard to the principle is merely to assure us (through its present existence for us) that satisfying the criterion of the principle is (at present) possible for us : re `(at present).+(for us)` N.B. `this contingency.+affects neither.+criterion.+nor.+principle, both remain absolute`s @ text.notes.brec moral law, conditions that hold a) an absolute principle defining the criteria of right action : re `an absolute principle defining the criteria of right action` see `^*: re .moral law.+${same}`s @ ~/work/ethics/text.brec - the principle is absolute ∵ it is grounded in a truth of (practical) logic|reason