00, notes / repository branch 05 !! high and dry, unable to make a confident start | I lack confidence in my arguments because none is convincing in itself - though the arguments cohere well enough, and each is at least plausible ? is it true that *none* is convincing? | at least one argument is convincing in itself - stability entails the autotelic principle, whereby it *is* constitutive of reason - I can make this argument directly at the outset / it does not depend on the full outlook argument : see 70.brec - it depends only on: a) disengagement from the existential mechanisms of the other normative sources b) theoretic and practical necessity vs. contingency c) the criterion of success vs. failure of reason - not only the constitutive argument, but also the principles of reason depend on criterion (c), and perhaps (b) too + consider starting with this / much as originally planned, but with more confidence I hope | no rhetorical thread to weave through the arguments - though the arguments cohere well enough, I fail to come to grips with the task of writing them because I see no storyline or other rhetorical handle that would unify them | put motivation and meaning first, hanging the arguments confidently from that - there hooking the general reader, as I was hooked - thereafter holding him (and so maintaining confidence) through each argument sync+ with notes : privately see ~/work/ethic/._/05/20_origin.notes.brec : privately see ~/work/ethic/._/05/._/origin.notes_boneyard.brec : see notepad:all